<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>reporting on nlmixr2</title>
    <link>https://blog.nlmixr2.org/tags/reporting/</link>
    <description>Recent content in reporting on nlmixr2</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.nlmixr2.org/tags/reporting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Model diagrams and equations, straight from the code</title>
      <link>https://blog.nlmixr2.org/blog/2026-09-29-model-diagrams-equations/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://blog.nlmixr2.org/blog/2026-09-29-model-diagrams-equations/</guid>
      <description>Watch on YouTube
Many pharmacometric reports have the same two items near the top of the methods section: a compartment diagram of the final model and the equations that define it. They are also two of the easiest things to get wrong.
The diagram is usually drawn by hand in PowerPoint or Visio early in the analysis. The equations are typed into Word or LaTeX from the control stream. Then the model changes – a transit compartment is added, the effect goes from stimulation to inhibition, a covariate moves – and the code is updated but the figure and the math are not.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
